<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MSFT Product Marketing Fail</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tomloverro.com/2009/06/03/msft-product-marketing-fail/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tomloverro.com/2009/06/03/msft-product-marketing-fail/</link>
	<description>The irreverent technology &#38; entrepreneurship blog of Tom Loverro</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 09:22:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: tloverro</title>
		<link>http://www.tomloverro.com/2009/06/03/msft-product-marketing-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>tloverro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 07:08:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tomloverro.com/?p=139#comment-6</guid>
		<description>Interesting. Yeah, funny I had Windows ME too. I wanted to like it so badly but eventually I had to uninstall it in favor of Win2k.

I&#039;ve been kicking around an idea for a blog post about what I would do improve MSFT. There are parts of it I LOVE (office) and parts I hate (WinMo)...when I have the time I think this will become its own post. What parts of MSFT I would keep/feed and what parts I would cut off and cast away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting. Yeah, funny I had Windows ME too. I wanted to like it so badly but eventually I had to uninstall it in favor of Win2k.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been kicking around an idea for a blog post about what I would do improve MSFT. There are parts of it I LOVE (office) and parts I hate (WinMo)&#8230;when I have the time I think this will become its own post. What parts of MSFT I would keep/feed and what parts I would cut off and cast away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe Y perro</title>
		<link>http://www.tomloverro.com/2009/06/03/msft-product-marketing-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>joe Y perro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 05:03:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tomloverro.com/?p=139#comment-5</guid>
		<description>I agree, Tom. MSFT has no f---ing clue. I proudly owned their stock in the &#039;90s. You know, when they had competition, i.e. people they could steal ideas from and &quot;innovate&quot; by complexifying it and adding it to their releases. Along the way I noticed something interesting. Their software had lots of features that were never presented or explained. DOH! .  As a shareholder this was gut wrenching. The company was investing $$$s in new features and unable to get them noticed and realize a premium. IOW, too many product managers looking busy adding features to products that no one ever used.

I bought one of my employees in a different state a new Dell box with MSFT&#039;s &quot;Millenium ME&quot;. A total dung heap of an operating system. Full of bugs and GUI eye candy, rushed out &#039;cause they needed a new OS release.

Today you would call that mistake &quot;jumping the shark&quot;. Though I didn&#039;t know that term then, it was clear Gates &amp; Co had transitioned from competing against other companies, to sitting on their butts and using their monopoly position to sell crap like Milleium Me because they wanted a new OS upgrade cycle.

I bailed by 2000, selling every share I owned of MSFT by Summer.

I continued to own Dell and actually liked their notebooks running XP Pro. I played with a Vista beta release. It was Millenium Me deja vu -- another piece of shit full of bugs that MSFT was pushing into the market because they believed they needed revenues from another OS upgrade cycle.

I didn&#039;t care. I had sold MSFT, and bought a MacBook after a 12 yr. absence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, Tom. MSFT has no f&#8212;ing clue. I proudly owned their stock in the &#8217;90s. You know, when they had competition, i.e. people they could steal ideas from and &#8220;innovate&#8221; by complexifying it and adding it to their releases. Along the way I noticed something interesting. Their software had lots of features that were never presented or explained. DOH! .  As a shareholder this was gut wrenching. The company was investing $$$s in new features and unable to get them noticed and realize a premium. IOW, too many product managers looking busy adding features to products that no one ever used.</p>
<p>I bought one of my employees in a different state a new Dell box with MSFT&#8217;s &#8220;Millenium ME&#8221;. A total dung heap of an operating system. Full of bugs and GUI eye candy, rushed out &#8217;cause they needed a new OS release.</p>
<p>Today you would call that mistake &#8220;jumping the shark&#8221;. Though I didn&#8217;t know that term then, it was clear Gates &amp; Co had transitioned from competing against other companies, to sitting on their butts and using their monopoly position to sell crap like Milleium Me because they wanted a new OS upgrade cycle.</p>
<p>I bailed by 2000, selling every share I owned of MSFT by Summer.</p>
<p>I continued to own Dell and actually liked their notebooks running XP Pro. I played with a Vista beta release. It was Millenium Me deja vu &#8212; another piece of shit full of bugs that MSFT was pushing into the market because they believed they needed revenues from another OS upgrade cycle.</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t care. I had sold MSFT, and bought a MacBook after a 12 yr. absence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
