MSFT Product Marketing Fail


The effects of oversteering.

The effects of oversteering.

In the news today is word that a Marketing Manager at Microsoft is trying to steer the computing industry away from the word “netbook” toward something more…how shall I say…higher end, all encompassing and pricier sounding.

Product marketing is not the art of taking something that’s popular and going against the tide. Product marketing is about either setting the direction of the tide or going with the flow.

It’s going to be difficult to near impossible to replace an essentially organic and entrenched term such as “netbook” with something entirely artificial. MSFT doesn’t have the best product marketing track record to boot either. Have you seen Microsoft get embarrassed by Apple’s ads? Can you name something Windows Mobile is known for?

But please don’t take me for a Microsoft hater. In fact, I consider Microsoft Office the single greatest software suite of all time. I just take offense to much of their product marketing. They need to stop having more flavors of Windows than a Baskin Robbins. They need to convince computer makers to stop marketing primarily on MHz and long lists of tech specs. And they shouldn’t try to perform invasive surgery on the fledgling netbook industry just as its taking off. MSFT should think of netbooks as the most exciting thing to happen to them since virtualization (which, incidentally is another example of a force they reacted to with hostility at first in terms of Windows licensing before finally embracing.)

In summary, MSFT Product Marketing Managers, please listen up. Stop trying to fight the world around you for a moment just because it wasn’t conceived of in Redmond. Go with it. Be one with the people.

Source

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Posterous
  • RSS
  • Print
  • email
  • Interesting. Yeah, funny I had Windows ME too. I wanted to like it so badly but eventually I had to uninstall it in favor of Win2k.

    I've been kicking around an idea for a blog post about what I would do improve MSFT. There are parts of it I LOVE (office) and parts I hate (WinMo)...when I have the time I think this will become its own post. What parts of MSFT I would keep/feed and what parts I would cut off and cast away.
  • joe Y perro
    I agree, Tom. MSFT has no f---ing clue. I proudly owned their stock in the '90s. You know, when they had competition, i.e. people they could steal ideas from and "innovate" by complexifying it and adding it to their releases. Along the way I noticed something interesting. Their software had lots of features that were never presented or explained. DOH! . As a shareholder this was gut wrenching. The company was investing $$$s in new features and unable to get them noticed and realize a premium. IOW, too many product managers looking busy adding features to products that no one ever used.

    I bought one of my employees in a different state a new Dell box with MSFT's "Millenium ME". A total dung heap of an operating system. Full of bugs and GUI eye candy, rushed out 'cause they needed a new OS release.

    Today you would call that mistake "jumping the shark". Though I didn't know that term then, it was clear Gates & Co had transitioned from competing against other companies, to sitting on their butts and using their monopoly position to sell crap like Milleium Me because they wanted a new OS upgrade cycle.

    I bailed by 2000, selling every share I owned of MSFT by Summer.

    I continued to own Dell and actually liked their notebooks running XP Pro. I played with a Vista beta release. It was Millenium Me deja vu -- another piece of shit full of bugs that MSFT was pushing into the market because they believed they needed revenues from another OS upgrade cycle.

    I didn't care. I had sold MSFT, and bought a MacBook after a 12 yr. absence.
blog comments powered by Disqus